| А а A a |
Б б B b |
В в W w |
Г г G g |
Д д D d |
Е е Ie ie |
Ё ё Io io |
Ж ж Ż ż |
З з Z z |
И и I i |
I i I i |
| К к K k |
Л л L l |
М м M m |
Н н N n |
О о O o |
О̂о̂ Ó ó |
П п P p |
Р р R r |
Р̌р̌ Rz rz |
С с S s |
Т т T t |
| У у U u |
Ф ф F f |
Х х Ch ch |
Х̾х̾ H h |
Ц ц C c |
Ч ч Cz cz |
Ш ш Sz sz |
Щ щ Szcz szcz |
Ъ ъ - |
Ы ы Y y |
Ь ь - |
| Э э E e |
Ю ю Iu iu |
Ю̂ю̂ Ió ió |
Я я Ia ia |
Й й J j |
А̨ а̨ Ą а̨ |
Я̨я̨ Ią ią |
Э̨ э̨ Ę ę |
Е̨ е̨ Ię ię |
- ^ Навумчык, Сяргей (2019-05-14). "Рэфэрэндум-95 пра сымболіку і мову ня быў легітымным" [Referendum-95 about symbols and language was not legitimate]. Радыё Свабода (in Belarusian). Archived from the original on 2025-04-18. Retrieved 2025-04-18.
- ^ Pastukhou, Mikhail (2019-05-14). "Pahonia And White-Red-White Flag Remain State Symbols Of Belarus". charter97.org. Charter97. Archived from the original on 2025-04-18. Retrieved 2025-04-18.
All these factors suggest that the vote was held under duress, most likely with serious fraud. There is evidence (for the most part – from the BPF observers) that, especially in rural areas, there were violations of the law, stuffing. The "referendum" of 1995 and its outcome cannot be recognized as legitimate. This means that the symbols that acted according to the laws of 1991, remains legal and legitimate, which is also true about the status of the Belarusian language," – ex-judge of the Constitutional Court of Belarus Mikhail Pastukhou concluded